View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-02-2015, 23:22
Scott Kozutsky's Avatar
Scott Kozutsky Scott Kozutsky is offline
Registered User
FRC #0865
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 123
Scott Kozutsky will become famous soon enough
Re: belt drive VS chain drive

It's all about implementation. We had belts on our versachassis WCD last year and we switched to chain because the belts were breaking (they were waaay out of spec. load so that makes sense). The equivalent pitch diameter and width of 25 chain was much stronger and performed fine (24t 9mm belt vs 18t 25 chain).

My experience with chain and belt:

Belt is lighter, do not stretch, are quieter, and more efficient than chain.

Chains requires less precision, are much smaller for the same strength, are much easier to source (especially up here in Canada), can be easily modified to different lengths, have many more available sprocket sizes, you can easily make any sprocket you can't source if you have a CNC mill, and chains can be easily bolted to for a function.

We like the compactness and general ease of use of chain so we decided to use it over belt this year.
__________________
2010-2012 FRC 865 Warp7 Student, Mechanical
2013 FRC 1310 RUNNYMEDE ROBOTICS Student, Mechanical, Design
2014 FRC 865 Warp7 Student, Mechanical, Design
2015 FRC 865 Warp7 Alumni, Mechanical Mentor

Last edited by Scott Kozutsky : 19-02-2015 at 23:24.