View Single Post
  #195   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-02-2015, 21:42
lcoreyl's Avatar
lcoreyl lcoreyl is offline
WittyTitleGen can't link to library
AKA: Milner
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 201
lcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud of
Re: Robowranglers 2015: Batman & Robin

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricLeifermann View Post
148's advantage is the HP stacker.

There will be other singular robots that get 3 RC and a tote stack in auto. 148's advantage comes from being able to place stacks while their also creating another stack.
this is what I implied by saying they are effectively 2 robots, which was just repeating what other people already said.
While their auto is incredible to watch, it is the prospect of how many max stacks they can make by themselves that is intriguing to me...

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricLeifermann View Post
Unless they change from the video 148 does not get the RC set and they CAN'T get the robot set so that's 12 points they won't be able to get. Is up to you to make sure your alliance can get those 12 and then at least go point for point them them the rest of the match. And that really only matters in the finals.
would you bet on them not being able to get the RC set? For the sake of argument, let's say they decide to just scrap hook bridge and floppy, and their alliance decides against the RC set because reasons. Don't you think they will more than make up for those 12 points?

I’m a little shocked that, unless I missed a post here, no one has speculated to their scoring ability? In a year with no defence?

I’ll start: I’m going with all 30 alliance station totes making 5 x 6 tote stacks with >=3 of those with a noodled RC on top is their “no problem” baseline. 28 auto + 30x2 totes + 3 n6RCs = 178?
Reply With Quote