Thread: 2 v 3 in Dallas
View Single Post
  #117   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2015, 10:45
pmangels17's Avatar
pmangels17 pmangels17 is offline
Mechanical Marauders - Alumnus
AKA: Paul Mangels
FRC #0271 (Mechanical Marauders)
Team Role: Mechanical
  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Bay Shore, NY
Posts: 404
pmangels17 has a reputation beyond reputepmangels17 has a reputation beyond reputepmangels17 has a reputation beyond reputepmangels17 has a reputation beyond reputepmangels17 has a reputation beyond reputepmangels17 has a reputation beyond reputepmangels17 has a reputation beyond reputepmangels17 has a reputation beyond reputepmangels17 has a reputation beyond reputepmangels17 has a reputation beyond reputepmangels17 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boltman View Post

Best alliance of three teams won in Dallas. That's what happened.
You can't make that argument unless we know the full situation, which I'm not entirely sure that we do. You could very well be correct, but given the way the finals turned out, and the statement from 987 that they were a solenoid flip away from compliance, and that the rules allow explicitly for a quick fix of the problem if it is a quick fix, shouldn't there have been given time to 987 (and for that matter 118's third pick) to fix their non-compliance issues? The debate isn't really over who is the best, it is about who was or was not given a fair chance to prove that they were the best.

Quote:
Did you see that Superbowl where 19-0 Patriots lost are we complaining over that?
As a humble New Yorker, I'm glad to see people still sour that they lost to us in two superbowls
__________________
Junior at the University of Notre Dame, Mechanical Engineering

Got questions (about Notre Dame, robots, college, etc), don't hesitate to ask.

**Bang Boom Pop!** "Was that the robot?" "I don't know, do it again"
**BANG BOOM POP** "Oh, now it's on fire."
Reply With Quote