View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-03-2015, 01:20
Doug Frisk's Avatar
Doug Frisk Doug Frisk is offline
Keeping Score
AKA: Doug Frisk
no team
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Behind the FMS
Posts: 352
Doug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Event Results and API Data

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
There is a difference between open for scrutiny and open source.

If I put a document in a PDF and send it to you for you to review, that is open for scrutiny. If, however, I simply put the same document in GDocs and send you the link--with full editing permissions--that is open source.


In code, open source could be pretty bad, DEPENDING on a number of factors. Particularly, comments and other documentation, work breakup, and even "code styles".

But having the code open for scrutiny--that might help.
Pretty much this. Because the FMS has to be built and fixed on a deadline, an open source model, where you are depending on people who have no reason to meet an arbitrary schedule or work on "uninteresting" bugs to work to a schedule and fix the uninteresting bugs.
Reply With Quote