Quote:
Originally Posted by SoMe_DuDe904
Although I agree with you that the containers boost the score too much I think the multiplication values need to be easy. Something like 2 points per level versus 4. You have to keep the scoring simple because the audience already has a hard time following this complex scoring system.
|
OK, good point, I was thinking in terms of the ref pads rather than in terms of explaining it to the stands.
If the Containers were 2 pts/level instead of 4, the Northern Lights top 12 qualifying averages would have been:
Rank - Team - Qual Avg -
New Rank - New Qual - Delta
1 3130 95.66 1 77.66 -18.00
2 525 92.22 2 70.66 -21.56
3 5172 77.66 4 65.22 -12.44
4 4623 75.22 3 65.22 -10.00
5 4859 63.22 5 63.22 -7.33
6 4624 68.55 7 60.33 -8.22
7 2512 67.55 6 61.55 -6.00
8 5638 67.11 8 59.11 -8.00
9 27 64.33 9 53.44 -10.89
10 2501 62.77 10 53.21 -9.56
11 876 60.44 12 49.55 -10.89
12 5232 59.88 11 50.77 -9.11
That change wouldn't affect the order of the standings much, but it would make them much tighter. Which I think would be a good thing as it makes the gap between the number 1 seed and the number 3 seed more surmountable.