Thread: Use of Timeouts
View Single Post
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2015, 14:30
Kris Verdeyen's Avatar
Kris Verdeyen Kris Verdeyen is offline
LSR Emcee/Alamo Game Announcer
FRC #0118 (Robonauts)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 696
Kris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond reputeKris Verdeyen has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Use of Timeouts

I thought of this after the Dallas finals -

In the past, there have been many instances of alliances using their timeouts to let their opponents repair their robot. This is still allowed, but the use of "cascading" time outs, or time outs one right after the other, are expressly forbidden.

Now, because the rules this year:
1. Require two wins in the finals to crown a champion (no tiebreakers).
2. Have a minimum score of zero

It's possible that two finals alliances could agree to just sit out a match, and should something happen (autonomous didn't get shut off, a human player not fully in the loop), intentionally cause penalties to force a 0-0 match (or matches) until all robots are at full strength.

This obviously does require a modicum of trust between the teams involved, but at most events, that's not too hard to come by.

It's possible that this would anger the refs: they are a proud creature who don't appreciate when their own weapon is used against them. But neither alliance is delaying a match, and you can't force teams to field broken (or even working) robots.
__________________
...Only a few people are awake and they live in a state of constant total amazement. -JP Shanley, Joe vs. the Volcano