Thread: Ramps
View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-03-2015, 00:34
Fusion_Clint's Avatar
Fusion_Clint Fusion_Clint is offline
Registered User
AKA: Clint Brawley
FRC #0364 (Fusion)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Gulfport MS
Posts: 243
Fusion_Clint has a reputation beyond reputeFusion_Clint has a reputation beyond reputeFusion_Clint has a reputation beyond reputeFusion_Clint has a reputation beyond reputeFusion_Clint has a reputation beyond reputeFusion_Clint has a reputation beyond reputeFusion_Clint has a reputation beyond reputeFusion_Clint has a reputation beyond reputeFusion_Clint has a reputation beyond reputeFusion_Clint has a reputation beyond reputeFusion_Clint has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ramps

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Anderson View Post
The ability to withstand a pull without breaking is not an issue for something like a passive tether/leash. Getting cut is what I'd worry about. A piece of material that's less than a millimeter thick seems likely to be easily damaged by robot wheels and gearboxes.

Eric's caution appears sound to me. I agree with the basic idea that you should also avoid making it difficult for people to see that you are following the rules, and a .035 wide line is going to be difficult to see.



For one thing, a tote stack in autonomous only counts if it is not in contact with a robot.
Again,

Don't worry about the effectiveness of a teams solution when it comes to whether it is within the rules or not. Again, anything that will cut a rope will also cut braided line.

"highly visible" is not a requirement in the rules. And the rule is supported by a robot, not touching a robot.

It is amazing to me that people with zero apparent experience with high visibility braided line are making such absolute statements about it.

I withdraw from this conversation on the basis that one should not argue with ....
Reply With Quote