To help inform people's voting, I created a spreadsheet (based on Ed Law's OPR/CCWM spreadsheet) with the teams that competed in week 3. It includes OPR, Qual Average, and Elim Average. I then created a basic 'Total Score' that is (25% of the team's OPR) + (25% of the team's QA) + (50% of the team's Elim Average). I pulled the Qual Average and Elim Average manually from the TBA so there are likely some errors.
The attached spreadsheet should also give all the teams competing in Week 3... feel free to sort by team number or any category or tinker around with the weights. I'm unsure particularly between whether a 25%/25%/50% vs 30%/30%/40% weight is better... in one way, weighing elim performance equally with qual performance makes sense; however, elim performance is very dependent on who teams partnered with... depth of event, presence of powerhouse, and such become very large factors. There is obviously the presence of co-op in quals and absence in elims.
Here are the top 30 by that Total Score...
Quote:
Team Total Score
2056 147.3
624 141.4
1619 137.4
1519 137.4
2852 132.3
1023 124.2
1983 123.1
1730 121.4
330 116.4
2974 115.3
230 113.3
744 113.2
973 113.1
3339 111.9
1296 111.3
2122 109.6
3604 109.4
1574 108.9
192 108.3
234 107.5
3230 107.1
2468 104.1
1318 104.1
135 103.9
1806 103.3
1523 103.0
225 99.6
4451 99.3
1197 94.9
662 93.6
|