View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-03-2003, 01:04
Katie Reynolds Katie Reynolds is offline
Registered User
no team (NEW Apple Corps)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Appleton, WI, USA
Posts: 2,598
Katie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond reputeKatie Reynolds has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Katie Reynolds Send a message via Yahoo to Katie Reynolds
The new rule puts a whole new twist on strategy. Before, it was generally, "try to get a score close to your opponent's during the qualification rounds, and pound your opponent into the ground during the elims." Now, teams need to use the same basic strategy during the qualification matches as well as the elimination matches. It also prevents teams from building strictly "elimination round" robots - robots that score low during the qualifying rounds because they completely dominate the field and can kick the snot out of almost anyone who goes against them.

I do think there should have been more emphasis placed on this new rule at the start of the season, however I don't think there should be any changes made now. The rules were there for all teams to read during the build - anyone could have read them and looked at them. Because some teams did not see the new twist on a rule, is not grounds enough for FIRST to change the way things are run. Changing the rules now would be especially unfair to those teams that have already competed.

- Katie
__________________
Team #93 - NEW Apple Corps
Student - 2001-2004
Team #857 - Superior Roboworks
Mentor - 2006-2009

Last edited by Katie Reynolds : 11-03-2003 at 01:06.
Reply With Quote