|
Re: This year's "game" is a job, not a game
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rangel(kf7fdb)
Frank mentioned it when he was a guest on Gamesense. He did mention that the GDC was pretty split on the decision of adding the step and removing defense. I have to agree though that if the landfill was a neutral zone and step removed, we might have seen much cooler play especially at the highest level. As it stands now, Einstein will probably be decided in the first second of autonomous. Though I'll wait to see if that will end up being the case or not.
|
Wondering if there might be a 'CanBurgler' agreement at the higher levels of play. Both sides agree to grab two cans (not fighting over them), and may the fastest stacker/topper win.
An alternative to avoid the 1/2 second decider issue, would be to make step resources off limits until an alliance has placed a set number (6?) of (capped?) grey totes on scoring platforms. Or maybe you can't get a step can until you've used your three cans to cap stacks-- now its a race..
Maybe some good ideas for IRI and other off season events ?
__________________
John Vriezen
FRC, Mentor, Inspector #3184 2016- #4859 2015, #2530 2010-2014 FTC Mentor, Inspector #7152 2013-14
|