View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-03-2015, 11:08
jds2001 jds2001 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jon Stanley
FRC #4263 (CyberDrgaon)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 160
jds2001 has much to be proud ofjds2001 has much to be proud ofjds2001 has much to be proud ofjds2001 has much to be proud ofjds2001 has much to be proud ofjds2001 has much to be proud ofjds2001 has much to be proud ofjds2001 has much to be proud ofjds2001 has much to be proud of
Re: In b4 buttongate

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtemusMaximus View Post
This to me is a good example of Bureaucratic ruling.
Not sure what you mean here - the rules (and Q&A - in particular Q439) make it very clear that "support" is only transitive through other TOTES - not any other object that may be on the FIELD, regardless of whether it was intended to be there or not. Is this a literal interpretation of that? Yes, but if you start reading things into the rules that aren't there, then they become sort of "guidelines", not rules.

If I were a ref (which I'm not) the deciding factor for me would be if I could easily dislodge that button from the stack - i.e. is it just there on the edge of a TOTE, or is it really wedged in there? If the former, it scores - there is unambiguously no support being provided by the button. If the latter, then it doesn't score. From the picture, it could go either way. Of course, I defer to the ref at the match for the ruling, which was that it didn't score.
Reply With Quote