Thread: Should the Number One seed be Alloud to pick the Number Two seed?
View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-03-2015, 20:35
The other Gabe's Avatar
The other Gabe The other Gabe is offline
Too many events, not enough time
AKA: I'm a volunteer now!
no team (2046 Bear Metal Alumn)
Team Role: Alumni
  
Join Date: Feb 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 429
The other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud of
Re: Should the Number One seed be Alloud to pick the Number Two seed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunawayEngineer View Post
This is amazing to me.
I thought that in previous years, the #1 seed won close to 90% of events. If anything, I would have thought the QA ranking would give even more power to the #1 seed.
not if you can make a late pick alliance that works strong as a team; usually 2 stackers and a capper/RC grabber... the QA thing just means that the ranking more reflect the ability of the robot to score by itself, and doesnt allow for too much carrying by getting with good teams
__________________
Do the best you can with what you are given

FRC 2046 2012-2015
Field Scout lead 2014-2015
Reply With Quote