|
Re: Analysis of team ranking
Additional comments:
- obviously there variance in team performance, so this won't be a perfect predictor
- these results list a couple teams as providing negative points on average -- this is fairly clearly not true. These teams probably contribute about 0 points on average. This actually gives a pretty good rough estimate of the precision of these numbers (error of ~3 should be expected on all numbers)
- if teams have strategies that involve working together in some way, this model does not account for that.
- if teams have strategies that interfere with each other (i.e. all 3 teams need to be fed at the feeding station to reach their full potential), this model does not account for that
|