Quote:
Originally Posted by GeeTwo
The documentation isn't clear. Going back to the source code, it appears that the timer carries the "accumulated time" from a stop to a start, so if you want to zero the result of later get()s, you must do a reset(). (I'm presuming that the C++ and Java versions behave equivalently.) |
Ok so if we implement something equivalent to this code, right before I start it I will do a timer.reset();