|
Re: Ranking by Median Score
I'm generally please withe the averages approach this year, with one huge caveat...the number of matches vs the number of teams at an event.
At VA we only had 8 matches, and 64 teams, and I don't feel that was enough to adequately sort. The sort was starting to make sense, but I don't think it had enough to truly reflect what was going on; and in that sense failed the teams some.
I haven't looked at medians and how that progressed, but I'll poke around and see what my feelings are on that. My gut feel is mean is better than median.
|