[EricH]

Originally Posted by waialua359

How does a head ref determine a move that is "strategic?"

Not sure. I would go with "I'll know it when I see it", and note that at the events I was at, I only saw a half-dozen cards or so: G6-1 x 3 (I think), G2 x 1, and G19 x 1 or 2. Nothing strategic.

Whatever the head refs told us at various events, we showed the rules, listened to their own interpretations, and followed for the sake of getting on with the matches.

Don't get me started on the "varying interpretations". I really don't like that. I like consistency--and clarity.