View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-04-2015, 23:49
Siri's Avatar
Siri Siri is offline
Dare greatly
AKA: 1640 coach 2010-2014
no team (Refs & RIs)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,621
Siri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to Siri
Re: Future FIRST Conferences & Non-Tournament Inspiration

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
Proposal:

Teams can register for "Conference Only" Champs spots as soon as registration opens. This offer would be extended to all teams (yes, I said ALL teams can register). Naturally, this would be a greatly reduced registration fee, say in the $100-$500 range/team at an early guess (teams pay travel and lodging). Teams that qualify for Champs or otherwise make it would get that fee applied to their Champs registration; I would also propose that any WFFA or Deans' list winners whose teams are attending get their fee refunded OR applied to airfare or lodging (AKA, free attendance), by FIRST. Other fee refunds/waivers/application to travel may, of course, be awarded at HQ's discretion.

For this fee, teams get: X mentors and Y students are given badges that allow them in the pits and stands and conference sessions and basically anywhere they want to go except down on the field (and maybe even that! HQ's call.) Conference sessions as noted above: professional development, leadership, student development, as well as the "standard" fare that's offered currently. Ideally, lunch would be supplied as well. And naturally, teams could bring more than their allotment, for an extra fee (say, a per-person cost of $50).


I could be way off on the pricing, but the main reason for having this be a paid thing at all is to 1) make sure attendees are serious about showing up, 2) give them a stake in their own development, and 3) help assist conference presenters with travel. (And, also, I recall hearing that a perception of "limited supply" or "good value" can also entice more people to show up--any marketing folks want to chime in?) Of course, I would anticipate that the scheduling allow for plenty of match-watching and pit-crawling, for some added inspiration; why not have one or more sessions on "design field trip"
I like it. I will just say that my only interest in having "eligibility" criteria is so that teams can go to their schools and say "look, we got into this leadership conference!" The major objection I've heard to strengthening the conferences in general is that teams can't get permission (and maybe sponsors/fundraising) to go just to watch and listen in St. Louis. Saying "we qualified" might really help with that, but I'd expect to have a lot of wait list spots--far more than Worlds/Half-Worlds does.

Even on it's own, I love the idea of "design field trips". I'm run off my feet at Worlds, but even I'd try to free up some time to browse around an (optional) poster session where students can present their team's design process, and their pit ambassadors repeatedly take small groups back to see the real deal. Dibs on 1114.
__________________
Reply With Quote