Quote:
Originally Posted by MechEng83
This is awesome!
I do have a suggestion (which also may not convey easily in words) which could be even better, but also requires more input data.
Rather than using a +/- 10 range in OPR, it would be good to use a team's standard deviation of OPR, which I guess would be related to the residuals from the OPR calculation. I don't know if this information is readily available, but it could narrow or expand the range possible, based on a team's consistency.
Just a thought.
|
I had the exact same idea actually. The problem with the OPR residual, however, is that it gives you information about the accuracy of the regression with regard to each
match, not each
robot.
If you took the set of residuals from the matches a robot played in, it makes intuitive sense that that data should contain
some level of information about that robot's deviation from their OPR. But is a data set of only 8-12 elements enough for this value to dominate the noise generated by their alliance partners' deviations (and therefore produce a meaningful standard deviation itself)? I dunno.
If some statistics wiz would like to chime in on this, I'd love to hear it.