View Single Post
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-04-2015, 20:26
lcoreyl's Avatar
lcoreyl lcoreyl is offline
WittyTitleGen can't link to library
AKA: Milner
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 201
lcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud oflcoreyl has much to be proud of
Re: The cheesecake runaway

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Van View Post
How about:

The Withholding Allowance (or perhaps anything brought into the competition venue) is limited to Spare or Upgrade MECHANISMS/COMPONENTS for the team's (not alliance's) robot. MECHANISMS/COMPONTENTS brought for the specific intent of being applied to other team's robots are prohibited. Teams are encouraged to bring COTS items to help/upgrade ALL teams at the event. Modifications to any team's robot belong to that team.

Is that a reasonable place to start from?

- Mr. Van
Coach, Robodox
No. It goes back to the rule that lead to the thread where the cheesecake term came from, which was then reversed because FIRST was made aware of how it disallowed so many things that are good for FIRST.

At this point I've read this and the 900 champs thread, and all I've seen is this:

Team Cheesecake: "as a recipient of cheesecake I can tell you this was extremely inspirational for our team. Our kids loved being a part of this alliance"

Team lactose/gluten/fat free cake: "This made me feel icky regardless of the fact the team it happened to didn't feel icky. This wasn't the intent of FIRST. Also the other teams that could do things and didn't get drafted felt icky. This should be outlawed!"

Unless someone has a better argument than how seeing this makes you "feel", I think the evidence is pretty overwhelming that only good came of this.
Reply With Quote