[spearbc]

I had my doubts about game excitement early in the season. I found the final matches interesting but I agree the robot interactions are more exciting for spectators.

I also agree with statements that lack of a defense allowed more creativity and more focus on design. But defense sometimes allows participation from younger teams that have not developed the capabilities for design. A box on wheels can do defense.

In the end, I would say games without defense are just another tool in the toolbox for game design. We should always have enough tools to keep folks guessing on the game requirements and provide opportunities for the different skill sets of different teams. I am a big fan of balance and would hate for a student to be on a team four years and never have a year where defense is not part of the game. But giving them a year without defense does allow that focus on Inspiration.

Cheers, BC