Quote:
Originally Posted by z_beeblebrox
We've considered this one extensively:
2015 - Robots win. Humans lose canburglar battles and can't carry many big, heavy game pieces at once.
2014 - Robots win. Humans are good at catching but have fragile ankles.
2013 - Humans win (maybe). Humans have no problem with the pyramid, but can't throw frisbees as fast or accurately as good robots.
2012 - Humans win. Humans can balance and shoot baskets no problem.
2011 - Robots win. Humans are short and lack minibots.
2010 - Humans win. Humans can control a soccer ball.
2009 - Robots win. Humans can't store many game pieces or easily pull a trailer.
2008 - Humans win. A human can run around the track and throw the trackball quickly.
I don't know enough about older games to evaluate human performance.
|
In my opinion humans would win most of the games.
1. If you only compare performance of
very good robots then you need to compare with
very good human players.
2. Humans are more versatile creatures, so strategies can be very complex and effective.
I am familiar only with last 2 games, so here it goes
2015 - Humans win. Even with cans stolen by robots, starting in autonomous mode humans can stack 10-12 or more stacks. If robot teams dare to throw noodles, humans can clear it in no time.
2014 - Humans win. Sheen pads, steel toed boots, superior passing and scoring game, tall goalie, superior speed and torque. Just have to remember that beam in the middle, but helmets will help
. The only way humans will lose is because of those insane penalties.