Quote:
Originally Posted by Citrus Dad
Strategic analysis: Karthik's talk at Champs covered most of this. Think before building. Game out all of the possibilities. Be willing to go down potential dead ends and cast aside your failures. We have developed a braintrust led by our mentor Mike Corsetto. You can't duplicate Mike but you can get most of the way there by duplicating the process. We make a list of what we would want to achieve and then slim it down to what is really achievable. For example we dropped landfill loading because we realized it was a tradeoff and that we couldn't do all types of loading plus a fast cangrabber. Last year we decided that being the top finishing shooter was less important in our overall strategy.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loose Screw
When it comes to deciding a strategy that you want your robot to follow, I do something with my FTC kids that I call point analysis.
|
This and some more of this. Before you even start thinking of designs, read ALL the rules with the entire team, and then decide on your strategy based off the game and scoring methods. For example, this year your priority list for scoring may have looked something like this.
Code:
1. Load from landfill
2. Stack to 6 high
3. Cap with a RC
4. Load RC with noodle
5. Load from HP
6. Pick up pool noodles off the ground
Once you set your strategy, you can start looking at designs on how to accomplish it. The important thing is making sure something low on your list doesn't trump something high on your list. For example using the list above, your ability to load from the HP should never jeopardize your ability to cap with an RC.