View Single Post
  #81   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-04-2015, 16:52
Kpchem Kpchem is offline
FTA, CSA, and all things technical
AKA: Kevin Emery
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 216
Kpchem is a splendid one to beholdKpchem is a splendid one to beholdKpchem is a splendid one to beholdKpchem is a splendid one to beholdKpchem is a splendid one to beholdKpchem is a splendid one to beholdKpchem is a splendid one to behold
Re: The Fraud of FTC Worlds - How FTC & FIRST have failed me forever.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FTC5110 View Post
Granted it would be unresonable to add some kind of review mechanism during qualification matches. However with FTC only 4 alliances go through to eliminations and there are a maximum (tied matches ignored) of 9 matches to determine the division winning alliance. It's hard work making it to eliminations and teams really deserve a fair shot without being cut down by errors.
I would agree that possibly giving each alliance a "review" card in addition to their timeout cards is a possible solution to the the time issue, and honestly one I didn't initially consider. It still doesn't solve the problem of the referees being under more scrutiny from the parents and teams, but I'm not sure if that issue can be solved while at the same time introducing a formal review process.
__________________
FRC 360: 2008-2011
Full-time Volunteer: 2012 - forever
Reply With Quote