View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-05-2015, 20:40
JimInNJ JimInNJ is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jim Bates
FTC #9765
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: May 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 23
JimInNJ has a reputation beyond reputeJimInNJ has a reputation beyond reputeJimInNJ has a reputation beyond reputeJimInNJ has a reputation beyond reputeJimInNJ has a reputation beyond reputeJimInNJ has a reputation beyond reputeJimInNJ has a reputation beyond reputeJimInNJ has a reputation beyond reputeJimInNJ has a reputation beyond reputeJimInNJ has a reputation beyond reputeJimInNJ has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2015 Lessons Learned: The Negative

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinRo View Post
I am happy there is so much interest in this subject. I believe that a great stream adds immense value to our events, which is why we (PNW) put together a strong video system and team. It allows others to be avid fans. It allows for schools across the region to show large numbers of students the dream of FIRST: To give recognition to science and technology.

The issue for FIRST is that video production is not in their core competencies. Shouldn't be either, they have enough to do. When they outsource the video production to others, the costs are surprising. It was cheaper for me to purchase all of the equipment for the PNW streaming setup than it was to hire a professional crew for a single event. Since we do 11 FRC events a year, the value proposition is quite reasonable. It cost us less than $1500 per event the first year. Subsequent years have about a 10% replacement / repair rate. So we spend about $3,000 a year (we have two full systems) in replacement cables and other enhancements.

To make this successful, a new cache of volunteer knowledge is required. The PNW took this on a couple of years ago knowing that a few dedicated individuals and a handful of students could put together a high class broadcast.

Our equipment is very reasonable quality, simple to use, and is good for 4 to 5 years. We have finished our second year. Each setup cost about $16,000 to put together. I shopped explicitly for equipment that would be suitable to be run by students, yet meets the standards for broadcast quality. As such, we end up with about 8 volunteers a week. Three of them need some level of training, and one technical director to help with the details needs a substantial (yet very doable) amount of training.

I am open to sharing everything we know with the greater FIRST community. FIRST is actively looking into how to improve the stream quality at all FRC events. Sometimes doing it with knowledgeable volunteers is a better approach. Keep in mind, most of the staff at an FRC event are volunteers. Integrating the volunteers in with the A/V company (Three Rivers, Sargent, or other local guys) isn't really a problem. It requires a set of volunteers to step forward and own it. Each show requires at least one adult to take ownership and to lead a group of other volunteers (adults and students)

Are you that person?

Kevin Ross
PNW District Chairman
I couldn't agree more that FIRST streaming has been spotty at best. I'm curious about where you get a clean outbound path at all of these different venues? Do you contract with a local carrier for temporary bandwidth, or do all of your venues have sufficient bandwidth available to provision your outbound stream in addition to all of the normal traffic?

Professional curiosity requires me to ask about your hardware setup. Do you stream HD or standard Def? How many cameras, lockoff, tripod or handheld? Do you take the interface from the scoring system? How big does your car/truck need to be to haul all of this gear around? What switch/SEG? Do you carry lighting as well? Sorry for all the questions, I'm preparing for a local group request that goes " Hey, you do video stuff at work, what can you do for us???"
Reply With Quote