|
Re: My List of Recycle Rush Simulators
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rangel(kf7fdb)
Idk scoring is pretty straightforward most years. Putting in very specific scoring won't really benefit anyone except for it being more fun. I would personally love a simulator that "drives" very similar to standard drivetrains. Being able to customize the drive-train with different "gearboxes", controls, and maybe gyro and encoder feedback would be awesome.
|
Developing a generic physics-based simulator that would be usefully accurate, is another tall order (see my other post). I would not be optimistic, except at the level of approximating things like generic high-speed and low-torque, or low-speed and high torque, (or middle-of-the-road on both) options.
In a separate, but related vein, developing a software-interfaces simulator that would help teams develop, test, and integrate their robot code would definitely be feasible without falling too far down too many rabbit holes. Someone should do it.
Blake
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases  I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate
|