View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-05-2015, 22:12
Qbot2640's Avatar
Qbot2640 Qbot2640 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Terry McHugh
FRC #2640 (Hotbotz)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Reidsville, NC
Posts: 473
Qbot2640 has a reputation beyond reputeQbot2640 has a reputation beyond reputeQbot2640 has a reputation beyond reputeQbot2640 has a reputation beyond reputeQbot2640 has a reputation beyond reputeQbot2640 has a reputation beyond reputeQbot2640 has a reputation beyond reputeQbot2640 has a reputation beyond reputeQbot2640 has a reputation beyond reputeQbot2640 has a reputation beyond reputeQbot2640 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: formal quality procedures in FRC?

As a quality engineer by trade, I have to admit some embarrassment at not thinking harder about implementing a quality focus toward our FRC team. After reading through this thread, it occurs to me that the FMEA (Failure Mode Effects Analysis) could be particularly useful here. In the early days of build season, the DFMEA (design) to consider all the possible things that could fail with the design and what effect they would have. This could be an effective way to determine where a flaw in the design could lead to a problem you would not otherwise have discovered. As strategy is developed, and procedures are developed for event preparation and participation, the PFMEA (process) to figure out what problems could occur surrounding team performance - similarly useful to guide strategy, maintenance, and other competition considerations.
__________________

2012 Palmetto Regional Winners (Thanks 2059, 2815, and 287).
2012 Newton 14th Seed
2013 Chesapeake Regional Imagery Award Winners
2014 North Carolina Regional Imagery Award Winners
2014 Greater DC Regional Team Spirit Award Winners
2015 North Carolina Regional Finalists (Thanks 3971 and 587)
Reply With Quote