View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-05-2015, 10:47
wgardner's Avatar
wgardner wgardner is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 172
wgardner is a splendid one to beholdwgardner is a splendid one to beholdwgardner is a splendid one to beholdwgardner is a splendid one to beholdwgardner is a splendid one to beholdwgardner is a splendid one to beholdwgardner is a splendid one to behold
Re: "standard error" of OPR values

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oblarg View Post
This appears to be correct, with one minor quibble: why not just write M = AO where the elements of O are random variables with the appropriate variance? It doesn't really make it cleaner to split it into a zero-mean "noise variable" plus a flat mean.
That would be different, I think. N is match noise and an m x 1 vector. If I understand your equation correctly, O would be the OPR random variable with mean of the "actual" OPR and some variance, but O is t x 1 and not m x 1, so I don't think they're the same. And the noise that the regression is computing is truly the noise to be expected in each match outcome, not the noise in the OPR estimates themselves. Or am I misunderstanding what you're saying?
__________________
CHEER4FTC website and facebook online FTC resources.
Providing support for FTC Teams in the Charlottesville, VA area and beyond.

Last edited by wgardner : 17-05-2015 at 10:52.
Reply With Quote