View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-05-2015, 21:04
glennword's Avatar
glennword glennword is offline
Resident Solidworks Guru
AKA: Glenn
FRC #4146 (Sabercat Robotics)
Team Role: Student
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 52
glennword is a splendid one to beholdglennword is a splendid one to beholdglennword is a splendid one to beholdglennword is a splendid one to beholdglennword is a splendid one to beholdglennword is a splendid one to behold
Re: pic: Short coaxial swerve module

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey Milia View Post
I won't dispute worm gears high reductions but i wouldn't describe them as relatively efficient. The highest efficiently you'll get is 86% with a four lead worm. At best this would be replacing the two stages before the co-axial, a miter stage and a timing belts stage, each around 95% or higher. I too am unsure of the benefits of a horizontal cim for a coaxial swerve but I don't think a worm gear would be beneficial on the Cim motor. However, using a worm gear for the steering motor is a different issue and has more merits in my opinion.
You are correct, sir. The miter gears I've had experience with are in all likelihood far below 95% efficiency, however upon further research I found that good quality miters in rigid and accurate housings can achieve those numbers. And of course belts are highly efficient, if properly tensioned.
__________________
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't--you're right."
-Henry Ford
Reply With Quote