Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH
Not specifically aimed at you, but you happened to be handy.
For all those who voted 5, would you care to share "undecided (at this time)", "withholding judgement", or "don't care" status at the time of the survey, and have you changed your response at this point?
../snip...
|
I don't actually remember where I put my mark, but I was somewhere between the 4-6 range.
The 2 event championship was definitely not my preference, but I think it is/was probably the lesser of several evils.
I am generally in the same boat from the alternative 2 event proposals. Not terribly for or against any of them.
I was happy in this blog that they will be discussing with teams possible events mixing strategies. This was actually my biggest concern with the rollout was that there were not be an allowance for mixing. I think Hall of Fame teams should probably get to rotate events. Same with "founders". though I would like if they could keep them at a reasonable balance (no more than a 1/3 to 2/3 ratio).
I have hope that they will do a summer event, and work with teams to find a way to make that work well. I have thoughts on how they could do that, and will see if some of those can be implemented.