View Single Post
  #173   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-05-2015, 15:34
Loose Screw's Avatar
Loose Screw Loose Screw is offline
A Loose Screw
AKA: Chris
FTC #5237 (Loose Screws)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Bedford
Posts: 121
Loose Screw is a jewel in the roughLoose Screw is a jewel in the roughLoose Screw is a jewel in the rough
Re: [FRC Blog] Two Championship Survey Results and Path Forward

Quote:
Originally Posted by Libby K View Post
I certainly can't speak for Sean, but IMO, the DCMPs can & should serve as the "championship experience" in their regions, and it would be to FIRST's benefit to do what they need to make sure all of the districts they work with end up looking at least as consistent across the country as regional events do.
I've thought of the competition at FiM champs to be very close to worlds. If you take 2011 for example, the #1 alliance was defeaded by the #8 at MSC. The meta changed durring eliminations and teams had to adapt to stay competitive. Everyone was at their best, and you had no idea who would win. Worlds that year, teams died and got stuck on the field. As soon as that happened, you knew who would win.

I find this year to be similar. Yes, the #1 alliance at MSC had the highest scores in Octo/Quarter/Semi, but any alliance there could have beat them if they made a mistake. If the blue alliance had grabbed that one RC 1711 spent the entire match trying to get, they would have won. The can wars wasn't as intense as it was on Einstein, but I feel like that made it more exciting to watch. The winners weren't determined in the first second of the match. Einstein, however, was determined by the can wars. Every alliance there could score 250+ points (some even 300+), but you knew who would win 5 seconds into the match.

TL;DR
DCMP's can be just as competitive and exciting to watch as Einstein.
Reply With Quote