Thread: [FRC Blog] Two Championship Survey Results and Path Forward
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-05-2015, 22:48
northstardon northstardon is offline
Robots are just like rocks, right?
AKA: Don Elsenheimer
FRC #2220 (Blue Twilight)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: Apr 2015
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Eagan, Minnesota
Posts: 37
northstardon is just really nicenorthstardon is just really nicenorthstardon is just really nicenorthstardon is just really nicenorthstardon is just really nice
Re: [FRC Blog] Two Championship Survey Results and Path Forward
Quote:
Originally Posted by iVanDuzer View Post
In terms of Chairman's, I would love to say "all Chairman's Teams should end up at the Tier One Event." I think that winning Chairman's would net a bunch of points, but unless you have a semi-decent robot (say, Semi-Finals at a regional, OR decent seeding, depending on how the points work out), then you wouldn't qualify for the Championship Event. A similar structure should be implemented for RAS and EI, although they'd need better on-field performance to qualify. Basically, winning any of these big awards should make it easier for you to get into the top-tier event. I firmly believe in the worth and value that Chairman's, RAS, and EI teams bring to the Championship event.
Isn't there some conflict between a tiered model that relegates CA winners to the lower tier event and the fact that the Chairman's Award is the most prestigious award that a FRC team can win? If regional/district CA winners with "semi-decent" robots qualify for Tier 1, and the other CA winners are in Tier 2, then how would you go about determining a CCA? Would there still be HOF teams?
Reply With Quote