View Single Post
  #56   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-05-2015, 00:00
tindleroot tindleroot is offline
Free Scouting Help to All
AKA: Casey LeeVan
FRC #4272 (Maverick Boiler Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 593
tindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Which robot(s) did you like the best this year?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sperkowsky View Post
Your game robot analysis seems a bit odd. Honestly I wasn't that impressed with 254 this year not saying they didn't make an amazing bot but I never thought they were going to Einstein. 1114, 118, 1678, 2826, 1657, 148, 179, 4488, 4039, 971, and 1538 are just some of the bots that I think had a way better design then 254 this year. I love 254 but I think after 2 years of making the community go crazy they missed their mark a bit.
I agreed with this completely...until SVR happened. Since then, 254 has blown me away by their abilities. No team, I repeat, NO TEAM, can score over 200 points BY THEMSELVES as consistently as 254 can. 254, time and time again, has scored 20+42+42+36+36+40=216 (given their opponent completes Co-op), hence their average over 200 at their final events. For them not to make it at LEAST to Einstein semifinals I thought was crazy - until it happened. Regardless, their robot made me "go crazy" after they improved for SVR.
__________________
2012-2013: FTC 4601 (student)
2014-2015: FRC 135 (student) - 5 banners in 2 years!
2016-present: FRC 4272 (mentor)

Thanks to all of our alliance partners!
11, 51, 68, 201, 234, 868, 1108, 1241, 1760, 3147, 3301, 3487, 3865, 4269, 4485, 4580, 5188

Reply With Quote