Quote:
Originally Posted by saikiranra
Attached are the A b and t CSV files from all official events from 2014 (Except for 2014waell, because some match scores are missing). The only difference, other than file name, is that the matches are not in sequential order within the A and b files, although they still correspond. The t files were generated by team number and the matches are in what ever order TBA decides to publish their JSON data (which I think is match number, alphabetically sorted).
|
Thanks!
The files appear to have the "new" A and "new" b. Could you by any chance also generate the "old" A and "old" b? I can generate the old A from the new A by stripping out the +1s and -1s from each row, but I can't generate the old b from the new b since the new b only has match winning margins and I can't get red and blue scores from that. Having both the old and new versions allows for quick and direct comparisons between OPR (which requires the old b), and CCWM and WMPR (which require the new b that can also be derived from the old one).
Maybe we can just call the old A and b by their names, and the new A and b something like Awm and bwm?
Quote:
Originally Posted by saikiranra
Also attached are CSV files that have the OPR, CCWM, and GPR (if we are still calling it that) of each team at each event.
|
It looks like the proposal of calling it WMPR instead of GPR may be sticking. As the "G" in GPR, I would prefer to not have the metric be name-based.
(Though I did work at Qualcomm for a long time and saw what "The Viterbi Algorithm" did for Dr. Viterbi's fame, I doubt there's as much money in obscure robotics statistical computations.)