View Single Post
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-06-2015, 17:22
Bennett548 Bennett548 is offline
Engineering Mentor
AKA: Steve Bennett
FRC #0548 (Robostangs)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 84
Bennett548 is just really niceBennett548 is just really niceBennett548 is just really niceBennett548 is just really nice
Re: paper: 2015 IRI Rule Changes

I think the intent was to give each team shot at two of the recycling containers on the step. Dividing the step in half is really the best way to do this, to prevent 610 and 1024 (for example) from colliding in the middle of the step.

In this case I feel the clarification was necessary to prevent teams from building blocking devices.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Leonard View Post
I don't believe this is the intent, but could a design like a one-sided 610 or 1024 be used, or would that be illegal?
The beauty of the clarification is that it provides a very clear answer to your question. If their "robot, robot part, or game piece that has been contacted by a robot" breaks that plane they are given a red card.

1024 could just only use one arm. 610 could remove half their arm and move the robot over a bit and that might work, but they may need to remove part of the structure so that it doesn't break that boundary plane.
Reply With Quote