View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2015, 15:54
asid61's Avatar
asid61 asid61 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Anand Rajamani
FRC #0115 (MVRT)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 2,214
asid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: CGX-104 V2 internals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Murphy View Post
With the combined stages, what constrains the intermediate pin assembly concentric? I could see if it's just the one stage there would be bearings on the output side, just like as pictured on the second stage output, but I don't see what holds the first stage output concentric. I suppose your eccentric input shaft might have a body that carries through, but that would complicate the shaft greatly and require a different "central" shaft for each stage configuration.

It's a cool design, thanks for sharing.
I was counting on it remaining concentric the same way the versaplanetary does, by constraining the gears with the pins, although it is possible to put a bearing on the output shafts if I extend the length of each stage and shorten the pin-holder output shaft block. I'm not sure if it's necessary, as the assembly is constrained mostly by the fixed ring pins and partially by the tranfer pins in a smaller ring.
The only alignment bearings right now are the ones on the output shaft and on any input motors.
__________________
<Now accepting CAD requests and commissions>

Reply With Quote