Quote:
Originally Posted by bkahl
The only problem:
Only one of the four alliances you listed won with their strategy.
How can it then be undefendable?
|
Because none of them executed the strategy correctly or had the exact composition of robots necessary to execute it perfectly.
Allow me to add emphasis:
Quote:
At it's core, it involves the undefendable finish strategy that 1918 used in that match, where they sat next to the low goal, received inbounds from the human player, and shot without having to move. It was quick and undefendable.
Executed perfectly, it could have been an undefendable trusser (like 900) coupled with a smart robot with a quick passback and an undefendable finisher (like 1918).
|
It also produced one of the greatest upsets of the year. I also know you disagree with me on this, as we've discussed it several times. That's not the point of this thread.
Allow me to add a disclaimer, then:
These opinions on strategy are my own and are not comprehensive of what is or is not true about strategy of that specific year.