|
Several anti-agreement people said that their team follows the strategy of not knocking down the other teams stacks unless nessisary. Now, you obviously feel that it is ok to tell others your strategy b/c you're posting it here. How is it different to tell your opponent this strategy.
Those that say that it removes the advantage of certain type of bots, are wrong. If a team feel that way then that team uses a different strategy, and the game is played with no agreement.
Also, seed number doesnt matter. Especially since a lot of you say that wining shouldnt be the goal. Dont forget that 2/3 of the teams in the finals DIDNT qualify! if a team has a well built robot then they will either qualify of be picked.
Our team didnt qualify, but we were picked. I consider it to be more of an honor to be "chosen" by another team than if we qualified.
It would be less GP to try to keep your score low to hurt your opponent. I saw this in a match where a team stayed off the ramp, b/c they knew it wouldnt make them win, and didnt want to help the other team (at least I think that was the reason).
btw- It is good strategy to let your opponant on the ramp. If you are winning by enough, it even makes since to take one of yours off and let both of theirs on. It is good for all 4 teams.
I dont like this type of scoring anyway. I think that teams should just get their points, and mabey 1/2 of their opponent's. This would cause teams to compeate b/c a box on your side is more valuable than their's.
just my $0.02 - sorry if I'm rambling
Matt
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
|