|
Has anyone tried building FRC waldos lately?
Waldos/Waldoes = Heinlein reference
The devices and software needed on the human side of the interfaces have been steadily getting smaller, more accurate, easier to use, and *cheaper*.
YouTube video of an example Full arm, plus hand and fingers mimicked by the movements of a (software-only) virtual person.
I'm curious if this sort of thing (which has been tried in the past, but was typically a novelty and not at all mainstream) is becoming more common in FRC robots, either as a way to steer/drive the robot, or as a way to control "manipulators".
Has using these sorts of human-machine integrations become the default for any teams?
For teams that have tried creating waldo-style FRC bots, but have now stopped, what were the reasons for stopping?
Blake
PS: I realize that FRC bots *don't* have have a zillion little motors to use mimicking the dexterity of a human hand. I'm thinking about how the motors that are on the robot, however few that might be, are controlled.
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases  I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate
|