View Single Post
  #101   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-07-2015, 10:41
RonnieS's Avatar
RonnieS RonnieS is offline
Just a tad washed up
AKA: Ronnie Sherrer
FRC #0314
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Flint/Warren
Posts: 389
RonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond reputeRonnieS has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Top 5 robots in each state

Quote:
Originally Posted by nikeairmancurry View Post
Michigans top 2 are both 1s..

1A- 1023
1B- 548
3- 33
4- 3641
5- Fill in any one of 10 different robots here
I agree with the top two....but 3 and 4 are questionable. I see it more as this as long as we are looking at this from a season over view standpoint. The top two were just good throughout, 314 had struggles but was fairly consistent with 3 stacks for a large part of the season...you can't deny 3 wins as number 1 seed. 33 was seen at its best doing 3 stacks, it seemed to be more of a 20 point auto and then 2. The 5th bots are hard, we had 68 doing 3 at its best plus starting to throw out more totes but had some consistency issues when their ramp was not perfectly aligned. 3641 started along the same lines with picking up in stack count as the season went on. 107 was for sure a dark horse for many people. Their 20pt auto and 2 stacks was pretty killer. If I recall correctly they started their 3rd often? Maybe I am thinking wrong on that one, someone correct me if so. I don't think that any of these teams are bad and are better than a majority of FRC.

1-1023
2-548
3-314
4-33
5-68/3641/107

-Ronnie
__________________
"Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience"

Last edited by RonnieS : 24-07-2015 at 10:53.
Reply With Quote