View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-07-2015, 19:03
jman4747's Avatar
jman4747 jman4747 is offline
Just building robots
AKA: Josh
FRC #4080 (Team Reboot)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 418
jman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: General Motor Rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeeTwo View Post
Would this only include brushed motors? Brushless motors and steppers would require different controllers, which is probably what's driving a lot of the standardization - ensuring that disabling the robot actually disables the actuators. Opening up to motors not from a specified list also increases opportunity lo lighten motors in what may be an unsafe manner. And what about hand-wound/homemade motors?
I mean brushed motors. That and the wattage/current limits from the op are meant to reduce the effect on the rules and inspection by not requiring additional rules for control electronics. The same controllers would still be able to be used.
__________________
---------------------
Alumni, CAD Designer, machinist, and Mentor: FRC Team #4080

Mentor: Rookie FTC Team "EVE" #10458, FRC Team "Drewbotics" #5812

#banthebag
#RIBMEATS
#1620