View Single Post
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-07-2015, 12:51
jman4747's Avatar
jman4747 jman4747 is offline
Just building robots
AKA: Josh
FRC #4080 (Team Reboot)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 419
jman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: General Motor Rules

I'm not trying to get one specific motor legalized and this thread isn't about stepper motors or brushless motors. The point is to make use of any comparable motors regardless of P/N. It has nothing to do with trying to obtain a marginal increase in power form an obscure motor. I am asking for the freedom to source and use similar motors at will. This has nothing to do with changing the allowed number of motors on a robot/total allowed power.

We already see teams short, stall, smoke, our current selection. We have snap action and main breakers, the motor will only have a 12V power source, and it's an 18ah lead acid battery. Thus regardless of the motor specs the electrical system will not allow more power output or current draw and won't pose more of a threat to the operators. If teams already burn out BB 550's what is the problem burning out a 550(ish) motor?

As for inspection, relax the restriction and base it off of simple criteria (like Adams idea). Don't change anything in the control or electrical system. You could even limit the motors to the 20 amp circuits like the custom circuit rules if that is a concern.
__________________
---------------------
Alumni, CAD Designer, machinist, and Mentor: FRC Team #4080

Mentor: Rookie FTC Team "EVE" #10458, FRC Team "Drewbotics" #5812

#banthebag
#RIBMEATS
#1620