Quote:
Originally Posted by techhelpbb
It's an interesting argument she's trying to make:
Basically she's arguing that because studies show that people in lower income areas. Often highly population dense urban areas (which is often ignored in those studies). Are more likely to die from overdoses of an unspecified drug that somehow rich kids are less at risk.
|
I made no argument, actually -- I simply asked to see a source that corroborates your affirmation that "rich kids = more potent drugs = more likely to die from overdose"
If, in fact, people of lower economic status are more likely to die of overdose, those who aren't a member of that population are undeniably at lower risk. They are not at zero risk, of course, but their risk is lower when compared to the population as a whole.
If you want to address a problem, the first step should be understanding the problem and sorting out the facts from hearsay.