View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-08-2015, 21:40
R.C.'s Avatar
R.C. R.C. is offline
2017... Oooh Kill em, Swerve!
AKA: Owner, WestCoast Products
FRC #1323 (MadTown Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Madera, CA
Posts: 2,179
R.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Smaller shifting cylinder

Quote:
Originally Posted by asid61 View Post
I'm working on a shifting gearbox design with two gears on the CIM that go directly to the shifting gears. I'm running into an issue where the CIM is too close to the shifter shaft, so I can't easily fit a regular Vex pancake cylinder there. I was going to swap it out for a 3/4" bore round body cylinder, but the mounting nut on that one is too large and hits the CIM. Is it feasible to use a 9/16" bore cylinder in place of the 3/4" bore? According to my calculation its force output is 16lbs compared to the 3/4" bore's 27lbs, but this is also on the first stage of the gearbox so the force required to shift should be less (there's a 2:1 reduction happening after the shifter).
We used a smaller shifter cylinder (round), 9/16 in both 2011 and 2012. Going to a smaller cylinder worked great, I think 973 did the same thing (Adam)? Also I recommend just tapping the mount so you can get a better OD/ID ratio.
__________________
R.C.
Owner, WestCoast Products || Twitter
MadTown Robotics Team 1323