View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-08-2015, 13:30
SerpentEagle's Avatar
SerpentEagle SerpentEagle is offline
Registered User
AKA: Shashank Rajesh
FRC #3641 (The Flying Toasters)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: May 2015
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: South Lyon, MI
Posts: 107
SerpentEagle is a splendid one to beholdSerpentEagle is a splendid one to beholdSerpentEagle is a splendid one to beholdSerpentEagle is a splendid one to beholdSerpentEagle is a splendid one to beholdSerpentEagle is a splendid one to beholdSerpentEagle is a splendid one to behold
Re: Gearbox Design Feedback

Quote:
Originally Posted by asid61 View Post
The way your standoffs are supported, they're almost cantilevered off the main body of the gearbox for the left and right ones. You are also using 6 standoffs versus the traditional 4, any particular reason for that? Removing the leftmost and rightmost standoffs would simplify it a little.
I think you have 2-4 too many pockets, but proper build season planning can offset the machine time in the case of a drive gearbox.
Yeah I agree. Next time I'll work on keeping things closer to the bulk of the body, or just put a ring around everything. I put these extra standoffs as support for the cims, but I realize that a whole another set of standoffs is unnecessary.

I personally don't think that pockets are a time problem for machining, as a water jet or CNC mill would zip right through them in a matter of minutes. But I will definitely work on simplifying the structure a bit more.