View Single Post
  #92   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-08-2015, 20:17
The other Gabe's Avatar
The other Gabe The other Gabe is offline
Too many events, not enough time
AKA: I'm a volunteer now!
no team (2046 Bear Metal Alumn)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 429
The other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud of
Re: Alliance Captain versus last pick in Alliance Selection

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery View Post
The statement begins and ends with "In a good game." If 1671 doesn't have a top flight game and fails to put up 3x 42, you've almost certainly lost the match. Allowing 118 to take one of the three containers greatly reduces the stress on 1671 and ensures all three containers' value is maximized.

You're not losing any uncapped stacks worth of points. Not the (and change) statements. That refers to uncapped stacks being placed after the capped stacks. Especially once you remove the time investment for 1671 to acquire and noodle their 3rd can, they should be able to get the same raw total of totes placed as you proposed (or more). 118 could work 1678's volume from the right station and is better suited to the additional totes from the landfill.
I suppose that makes sense... when you said "and some change", I assumed like, 3 totes, not a full stack

Edit: one thing I did notice in 118's reveal video is that they used a different collector (It looked pretty much just like 1678's) when doing feeder station as compared to landfill- I don't know how this would affect their landfill abilities, though...
__________________
Do the best you can with what you are given

FRC 2046 2012-2015
Field Scout lead 2014-2015

Last edited by The other Gabe : 26-08-2015 at 20:26.
Reply With Quote