|
Re: [FRC Blog] Frank Answers Friday: Championship Slots
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ginger Power
Agreed. My only concern with any such system is that you take all the competition out of the finals. If everybody is guaranteed to go to champs you're basically playing an exhibition match. If you weighted the points such that only the winning alliance's 3rd robot also got to go that would be way more intriguing.
|
From my experience in a district, I've noticed that there tends to be one or two captain/first pick semifinalists that outrank the second pick winner, and a few more semifinalists that outrank the second pick finalist.
__________________
2016-present, Mentor, FRC 2791 - Shaker Robotics
2016: Tech Valley SF (5236, 2791, 3624) and Quality, Finger Lakes SF (5254, 2791, 2383), Battlecry@WPI Winner (195, 2791, 501), Robot Rumble Winner (2791, 195, 6463)
2016-present, Mentor, FRC 1257 - Parallel Universe
2016: Mount Olive Winner (1257, 5624, 1676), Bridgewater-Raritan Finalist (1257, 25, 3340, 555) and GP, MAR CMP Winner (225, 341, 1257), Archimedes SF (4003, 4564, 5842, 1257), IRI Invite
2012-2015, Student, FRC 1257 - Parallel Universe
2015: Mount Olive QF (1257, 1811, 1923) and Safety Award, North Brunswick Finalist (11, 193, 1257) and Team Spirit and Safety Awards
2014: Clifton Winner (1626, 869, 1257), MAR CMP QF (1257, 293, 303)
2013: TCNJ Safety Award
2012: Mount Olive QF (204, 303, 1257)
Last edited by Brian Maher : 30-08-2015 at 10:59.
|