View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-09-2015, 19:10
s_forbes's Avatar
s_forbes s_forbes is online now
anonymous internet person
FRC #0842 (Falcon Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,141
s_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bevel/Miter Gear Mounting Distances

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
AFAIK they all relied on the traditional radial bearing to handle these thrust loads.
One counter example is 1640, who has been re-iterating their swerve modules for the last few years and have one of the most fully developed systems (in my opinion). They still incorporate thrust bearings into their modules. It's only about $3.50 per bearing, so not really a large resource cost.

Anyone designing swerve modules should check out their wiki, it's a fountain of information. http://wiki.team1640.com/index.php?t...XI_Drive_Train