View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-09-2015, 10:44
jee7s jee7s is offline
Texan FIRSTer, ex-frc2789, ex-frc41
AKA: Jeffrey Erickson
FRC #6357
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: Dripping Springs, TX
Posts: 319
jee7s has a reputation beyond reputejee7s has a reputation beyond reputejee7s has a reputation beyond reputejee7s has a reputation beyond reputejee7s has a reputation beyond reputejee7s has a reputation beyond reputejee7s has a reputation beyond reputejee7s has a reputation beyond reputejee7s has a reputation beyond reputejee7s has a reputation beyond reputejee7s has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Dow Red Stick Rumble - A Report

Off-seasons are a funny thing because they are interpreted so differently by so many teams. And, oddly enough, paying a modest sum of money seems to be at the core of the differences.

Some teams approach it as "well, it's a little money so we can get a field to play on and have some fun." While, for others, it's a "dang it, we paid for this and it should be better" attitude.

As the TRR Competition Coordinator (i.e. the guy who oversees all the rules changes, enforcement, etc), I've found myself tackling the same issues Daniel had to this past weekend. So many teams will register, but not all will show up. Some will register late, some will register early. It's just such a game of chance, and it's one where those of us who run these events need to deal with hard questions about the health of our events.

Take for example this year's TRR. We were planning on 4 team alliances for eliminations. But, we had so many no-shows that we ended up with only 27 teams. The decision is "easy" (quotes very much intended): just go to 3 team alliances. But, that means that three teams need to sit out. That can be hard to explain to people who paid good money to attend the event.

Or, go back to 2013 TRR, when our volunteers (particularly our referees) were downright worn down by teams wanting to win. We went 5 matches straight with the question mark box full for questions during eliminations. Our head ref that year, who is an excellent person, just couldn't handle the onslaught of teams pressing their questions out of their drive to win. We had to remind mentors around the field to not yell at the referees who are just human beings trying to do a good job. I don't blame those teams for wanting to win. But, when you get a volunteer crew that normally works one event, and decides to help you out through the goodness of their heart, and then has to deal with championship level stress after the AC fails in August in Texas, well, it's tough to retain all of them.

For the past three years running, we've had a World Champion team in the field at TRR. Oddly enough, for all of the arguments relating to "competitive" teams, we've found these teams and pretty much all the others at TRR to be nothing less than professional.

The thing about growing an event it just that: you need to grow it. It takes years, it takes effort, it takes both consistency and situations that are stable enough to make that consistency apparent. When things go wrong, you and your volunteers will take it on the chin. When things go right, some people will thank you, but it's not like a chorus of cheers. Registration will go up, registration will go down, you'll falter and you'll succeed. It takes time to establish the character of your event. But, sticking with it means a better community for you, your team, your state, and your region.

So, Daniel and the rest of the Red Stick organizers, keep up the good work. Don't let this year's perfect mis-alignment of the stars stop you from trying again next year.
__________________

2013 Alamo Regional Woodie Flowers Finalist Award Winner
2012 Texas Robot Roundup Volunteer of the Year
Texas Robot Roundup Planning Committee, 2012-present
FRC 6357 Mentor, 2016-
FRC 2789 Mentor, 2009-2016 -- 2 Golds, 2 Silvers, 8 Regional Elimination Appearances

FRC 41 Mentor 2007-2009
FLL Mentor 2006
FRC 619 Mentor 2002
FRC 41 Student 1998-2000
Reply With Quote