
12-10-2015, 20:09
|
 |
Trickle-Down CMP Allocation
AKA: Lizard King
 FRC #0422 (The Meme Tech Pneumatic Devices)
Team Role: Mascot
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: RVA
Posts: 2,240
|
|
|
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis
Does it need to be enforced? Or does the FIRST ethos of Gracious Professionalism ensure that there's no need to enforce it, so long as everyone is aware of a consistent set of definitions?
Part of the problem we've had in the past, I think, is teams taking credit for "starting" or "mentoring" a team that existed in their school system, even if they didn't have much interaction with them - after all, if they held a kickoff event the team attended, or talked with them once or twice during the season, that's interaction enough, right? Some people/teams may have said so honestly while others did not. Now the new definitions give teams a benchmark to measure themselves against, something they have never had before.
|
I would like to think this is the way it works but I am a bitter cynic with only occasional trust in the "system" to work. It's probably just me and not the environment but w/e.
|