|
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions
Quote:
Originally Posted by JB987
It may help to keep checking Frank's Blog to see direct responses from him regarding some of the questions in this thread...
Receiving team documentation
Permalink Submitted by Frank Merrick on Tue, 10/13/2015 - 10:24.
"Hi Liron. We had talked about requiring some documentation briefly, but did not want to turn this into a legalistic exercise. Our working assumption is that most teams, in keeping with the ethos of Gracious Professionalism, will not mislead about their support for other teams, once presented with reasonable definitions they are told they must adhere to. With the number of teams applying for Chairman's Award, some percentage certainly will still intentionally mislead, but we don't want to punish those who don't by requiring additional paperwork."
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis
Does it need to be enforced? Or does the FIRST ethos of Gracious Professionalism ensure that there's no need to enforce it, so long as everyone is aware of a consistent set of definitions?
|
I wonder where Frank got that particular phrase from  Hi Frank!
__________________
2007 - Present: Mentor, 2177 The Robettes
LRI: North Star 2012-2016; Lake Superior 2013-2014; MN State Tournament 2013-2014, 2016; Galileo 2016; Iowa 2017
2015: North Star Regional Volunteer of the Year
2016: Lake Superior WFFA
|